High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GLEESON CJ,
McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJ
HONG PHUC TRUONG APPELLANT
AND
THE QUEEN RESPONDENT
Truong v The Queen [2004] HCA 10
4 March 2004
M226/2002
ORDER
Appeal dismissed.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of Victoria
Representation:
O P Holdenson QC with J B McDougall for the appellant (instructed by Clarebrough Pica)
P A Coghlan QC with K E Judd for the respondent (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Victoria))
Interveners:
D M J Bennett QC, Solicitor‑General of the Commonwealth with M M Gordon intervening on behalf of the Attorney‑General of the Commonwealth (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor) at the hearing on 28 May 2003
D M J Bennett QC, Solicitor‑General of the Commonwealth with M M Gordon SC and L G De Ferrari intervening on behalf of the Attorney‑General of the Commonwealth (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor) at the hearing on 3 December 2003
R J Meadows QC, Solicitor‑General for the State of Western Australia with J C Pritchard intervening on behalf of the Attorney‑General for the State of Western Australia (instructed by Crown Solicitor's Office (Western Australia)) at the hearing on 3 December 2003
P M Tate SC, Solicitor‑General for the State of Victoria with K L Emerton intervening on behalf of the Attorney‑General for the State of Victoria (instructed by Victorian Government Solicitor) at the hearing on 3 December 2003
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Truong v The Queen
Extradition – Extradition to Australia from other countries – Extradition Act 1988 (Cth), Pt IV (ss 40‑44) – Speciality – Offences for which extraditable person surrendered – Request for extradition for offences including murder, kidnapping, conspiracy to commit murder and conspiracy to kidnap – Appellant surrendered to Australia in relation to conspiracy to commit murder and conspiracy to kidnap – Appellant charged and tried in Supreme Court of Victoria for murder and kidnapping – Whether offences of murder and kidnapping were offences of which the appellant could be convicted on proof of the conduct constituting the offences of conspiracy to commit murder and conspiracy to kidnap.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate