High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McHUGH J, GUMMOW, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJ
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING
COMMISSION APPELLANT
AND
TEMWOOD HOLDINGS PTY LTD RESPONDENT
Western Australian Planning Commission v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd
[2004] HCA 63
9 December 2004
P90/2003
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Orders 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Western Australia made on 22 May 2002 set aside. In their place order that the appeal to that Court be dismissed.
3. The appellant pay the respondent's reasonable costs of the appeal to this Court.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of Western Australia
Representation:
G T W Tannin SC with C J Thatcher for the appellant (instructed by the Crown Solicitor's Office of Western Australia)
D H Solomon with J C Giles for the respondent (instructed by Solomon Brothers)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Western Australian Planning Commission v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd
Town Planning (WA) – Statutory right to compensation conferred upon any person whose land or property was injuriously affected by the making of a specified planning scheme – Land injuriously affected by making of scheme not owned by respondent at time scheme was made but subsequently owned by respondent – Whether right to compensation passed with the land – Whether respondent had a statutory right to compensation.
Town Planning (WA) – Subdivision of land – Application for subdivision approval – Progressive subdivision of larger area – Town planning authority granted subdivision approval subject to a condition that a portion of the larger area be vested in the Crown free of cost and without any payment of compensation by the Crown – Whether condition imposed for a proper "planning purpose" – Whether condition fairly and reasonably related to the development permitted – Whether condition validly imposed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate