High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GLEESON CJ,
McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY AND CALLINAN JJ
Matter No S232/2004
JOHN DAVID RICH APPELLANT
AND
CGU INSURANCE LIMITED RESPONDENT
Matter No S233/2004
MARK ALAN SILBERMANN APPELLANT
AND
CGU INSURANCE LIMITED RESPONDENT
Rich v CGU Insurance Limited
Silbermann v CGU Insurance Limited
[2005] HCA 16
7 April 2005
S232/2004 and S233/2004
ORDER
In each matter:
1. Special leave rescinded.
2. Appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings in this Court.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Representation:
D L Williams SC with M A Jones for the appellants (instructed by Joanne Kelly)
D F Jackson QC with A W Street SC and E G Romaniuk for the respondent (instructed by Colin Biggers & Paisley)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Rich v CGU Insurance Limited
Silbermann v CGU Insurance Limited
Insurance – Professional indemnity insurance – Directors and officers liability insurance policy – Exclusion for losses arising from dishonest, fraudulent or malicious conduct – Exclusion engaged only where conduct established to have occurred following final adjudication adverse to the insured – Proceedings instituted against appellants involving questions of breach of duty as company directors – Appellants claimed for advance payment of defence costs under policy – Respondent insurer purported to deny liability relying on exclusion under the policy – Respondent also argued that it had avoided the policy under the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), s 28 – Whether respondent can rely on exclusion absent an existing judgment or other final adjudication adverse to appellants.
Practice and procedure – Appeal – Separated questions for determination – Appeal in respect only of one answered question and not in respect of other two – Whether any utility in considering the correctness of the answer appealed from in light of other two undisturbed answers – Avoidance of circuity of action.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate