High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GLEESON CJ,
McHUGH, GUMMOW, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJ
BELINDA ANN WILLETT (BY HER LITIGATION
GUARDIANS DEBORAH ANN WILLETT AND
PATRICK WILLETT) APPELLANT
AND
DUDLEY D FUTCHER RESPONDENT
Willett v Futcher
[2005] HCA 47
7 September 2005
B78/2004
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed with costs.
2. Set aside order of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland made on 20 February 2004 and in its place order that the appeal to that Court is allowed with costs.
3. Remit matter to the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland for the assessment of the damages to be allowed.
4. Amend title to the proceeding in this Court by deleting the words "an infant".
On appeal from the Supreme Court of Queensland
Representation:
D F Jackson QC with T Matthews for the appellant (instructed by Quinlan Miller & Treston)
D B Fraser QC with M P Kent for the respondent (instructed by McInnes Wilson)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Willett v Futcher
Damages – Measure of damages in actions for tort – Appellant suffered brain damage as a result of respondent's negligence – Application for approval of terms of compromise – Appellant unable to manage financial affairs – Administrator appointed to manage appellant's financial affairs – Where determination necessary to calculate "sum by way of damages in respect of reasonable management fees of the administrator" – Where requirement for management of funds arose as a direct result of respondent's negligence – Whether only certain kinds of costs of managing funds should be allowed in assessing damages – Whether damages to be assessed according to the position of an appellant not awarded a lump sum of damages, or according to the position of an appellant with a lump sum to invest but no disabling injury.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate