High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GLEESON CJ,
McHUGH, GUMMOW, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJ
CSR LIMITED & ANOR APPELLANTS
AND
JARRADD EDDY AS ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM
REPRESENTING THE ESTATE OF
THE LATE JOHN THOMPSON RESPONDENT
CSR Limited v Eddy [2005] HCA 64
21 October 2005
S523/2004 & S524/2004
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed in Matter No S523 of 2004.
2. Appeal dismissed in Matter No S524 of 2004.
3. Set aside order (1) of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales dated 26 November 2003 and, in its place, order that:
(a) the appeal to that Court is allowed; and
(b) the judgment of the Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales dated 4 April 2003 be reduced to $300,419.49.
4. Appellants to pay the costs of the respondent in this Court.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Representation:
D F Jackson QC with T G R Parker for the appellants in both matters (instructed by Makinson & d'Apice Lawyers)
M J Joseph SC with F L Austin and S P W Glascott for the respondent in both matters (instructed by Alex Stuart & Associates)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
CSR Limited v Eddy
Negligence – Damages – Asbestos-related disease – Compensation for plaintiff's inability to provide domestic assistance to wife – Whether damages are recoverable where a personal injury prevents a plaintiff from providing gratuitous personal or domestic services for another person ("Sullivan v Gordon damages") – Whether Sullivan v Gordon damages are analogous to Griffiths v Kerkemeyer damages – Whether Sullivan v Gordon should be accepted as part of the common law of Australia – Whether Sullivan v Gordon damages could be recovered for those years in which services may have been provided after the plaintiff's death up until the expected date of death but for the tort.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate