High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GLEESON CJ
GUMMOW, HAYNE, HEYDON AND CRENNAN JJ
JAMES HOUGHTON AND ANOR APPELLANTS
AND
SIMON ARMS RESPONDENT
Houghton v Arms
[2006] HCA 59
13 December 2006
M107/2006
ORDER
Appeal dismissed with costs.
On appeal from the Federal Court of Australia
Representation
D J O'Callaghan SC with M D Rush for the appellants (instructed by Deacons)
P J Riordan SC with D W Bennett for the respondent (instructed by Middletons)
D R Williams QC with S Bhojani for the Director of Consumer Affairs of Victoria appearing as amicus (instructed by Department of Justice)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Houghton v Arms
Trade practices − Misleading or deceptive conduct in trade or commerce – Where appellant employees of a corporation made misleading or deceptive statements to respondent in the course of their employment − Where the corporation was sued for contravention of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ("the Commonwealth Act") by reason of the conduct of the appellants − Where the appellants were also sued for contravention of s 9 of the Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic) ("the State Act") − Whether each appellant was a "person" for the purposes of s 9 of the State Act − Whether conduct of each appellant was "in trade or commerce" for the purposes of s 9 of the State Act.
Statutes − Statutory construction − Construction of s 9 of the State Act − Where the Commonwealth Act and the State Act have concurrent and overlapping operation − Where the Commonwealth Act had, but the State Act did not have, provisions imposing accessorial liability upon persons "involved" in a contravention − Where the Commonwealth Act had, but the State Act did not have, provisions deeming conduct engaged in on behalf of a corporation to have been engaged in by the corporation − Whether s 9 of the State Act is to be construed so as not to apply to persons who were not engaged in trade or commerce on their own account.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate