High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GLEESON CJ
GUMMOW, KIRBY, HEYDON AND CRENNAN JJ
Matter No S215/2006
RICHARD BRUCE CORNWELL APPLICANT
AND
THE QUEEN RESPONDENT
Matters No S281/2006 & S282/2006
THE QUEEN APPELLANT
AND
RICHARD BRUCE CORNWELL RESPONDENT
Cornwell v The Queen
[2007] HCA 12
22 March 2007
S215/2006, S281/2006 & S282/2006
ORDER
In Appeal No S281 of 2006 and Application No S215 of 2006:
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Application for special leave to cross-appeal granted and cross-appeal allowed.
3. Matter remitted to the Court of Criminal Appeal for consideration of grounds 2, 3, 4 and 6, and reconsideration of ground 5, in the appellant's notice of appeal to that Court.
In Appeal No S282 of 2006:
1. Appeal dismissed.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Representation
P Roberts SC for the respondent in Matter No S215/206 and for the appellant in S281/2006 and S282/2006 (instructed by Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions)
T A Game SC with S J Buchen for the applicant in matter No S215/2006 and for the respondent in S281/2006 and S282/2006 (instructed by Ford Criminal Lawyers)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Cornwell v The Queen
Evidence – Competence and compellability of accused persons – Accused convicted following retrial of conspiracy to import cocaine – Accused gave evidence after indications that a certificate under s 128(6) would be granted – At retrial, Crown sought to tender cross-examination evidence from first trial – Evidence held to be admissible at retrial – Construction of s 128(8) – Whether s 128(8) precluded accused from relying on the certificate – Privilege against self-incrimination – Meaning of "fact in issue" under s 128(8) – Distinction between "facts in issue" and "facts relevant to facts in issue" – Whether evidence went to a "fact in issue" at the retrial – Whether retrial was a "proceeding" to which s 128(7) applied.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate