High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GLEESON CJ
GUMMOW, KIRBY, HEYDON AND CRENNAN JJ
BRENT BURGE & ORS APPELLANTS
AND
JOHN HARLEY SWARBRICK RESPONDENT
Burge v Swarbrick
[2007] HCA 17
26 April 2007
P24/2006
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed with costs. 2. Set aside the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia and in their place order that: 1. the appeal to that Court be allowed with costs; and 2. the orders made by Carr J on 24 June 2004 be set aside and in their place order that: 1. the respondent's application to the Federal Court be dismissed; and 2. all questions respecting the cross-claims be stood over for determination by a judge of the Federal Court in conformity with the reasons of this Court; and 3. the respondent pay the costs of the appellants of the proceedings before Carr J up to 7 July 2004, including any reserved costs and the costs of the two motions notice of which was filed on 12 September 2003 and 3 October 2003.
On appeal from the Federal Court of Australia
Representation
J J J Garnsey QC with R J L McCormack for the appellants (instructed by Stables Scott)
D M Stone with T J Carmady for the respondent (instructed by Williams & Hughes)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Burge v Swarbrick
Copyright – Artistic works – Works of artistic craftsmanship – The respondent obtained an injunction against infringement by the appellants of the respondent's ownership of copyright in works constituted by a "plug" from which a mould for a yacht hull could be derived, and in the hull and deck mouldings of that yacht – Whether works protected by copyright or should have been protected, if at all, under the designs registration law.
Copyright – Artistic works – Works of artistic craftsmanship – Whether "work of artistic craftsmanship" is a composite phrase to be construed as a whole – Relevance of aesthetic appeal to the existence of a work of artistic craftsmanship – Relevance of machine production to the existence of a work of artistic craftsmanship – Relevance of functional or utilitarian constraints to the existence of a work of artistic craftsmanship – Whether the "plug" and mouldings constituted works of artistic craftsmanship.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate