High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GLEESON CJ
GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN, HEYDON AND CRENNAN JJ
GEOFFREY JAMES BENNETT & ORS PLAINTIFFS
AND
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA DEFENDANT
Bennett v Commonwealth of Australia [2007] HCA 18
27 April 2007
S111/2006
ORDER
Questions reserved for the consideration of the Full Court answered as follows:
(1) Q Is s 3 of the Norfolk Island Amendment Act 2004 (Cth), in so far as it gives effect to:
(a) Items 1, 3 and 4 in Part 1 of Schedule 1 to that Act; and
(b) Item 5 in Part 1 of Schedule 1 to that Act to the extent that that item inserts into the Principal Act the following new provisions:
(i) paragraph 39A(1)(b); and
(ii) paragraph 39A(2)(a); and
(iii) section 39C; and
(iv) the definition of "Returning Officer" in section 39D,
valid?
A Yes.
(2) Q Who should pay the costs in respect of the special case?
A The plaintiffs.
Representation
R J Ellicott QC with G R Kennett for the plaintiffs (instructed by Wright Stell)
D M J Bennett QC Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia with K L Eastman for the defendant (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Bennett v Commonwealth of Australia
Constitutional Law (Cth) – Powers of federal Parliament – Territories – Section 3 of the Norfolk Island Amendment Act 2004 (Cth) ("the Act") amended the Norfolk Island Act 1979 (Cth) so as to make Australian citizenship a necessary qualification for voting for, and standing for election to, the Legislative Assembly of Norfolk Island – Whether the provisions of the Act giving effect to the amendments were supported by s 122 of the Constitution.
Constitutional Law (Cth) – Territories – Whether the challenge to the validity of the Act presented a political question not amenable to judicial determination – Whether "laws for the government" of a territory, to be valid, must provide for a form of government appropriate to the circumstances of the particular territory.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate