High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GLEESON CJ,
GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, HEYDON AND KIEFEL JJ
MARJORIE HEATHER OSLAND APPELLANT
AND
SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE RESPONDENT
Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice [2008] HCA 37
7 August 2008
M3/2008
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria made on 17 May 2007.
3. Remit the matter to the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria for further hearing in accordance with the reasons of this Court.
4. Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal to this Court.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of Victoria
Representation
J B R Beach QC with R H M Attiwill and J D Pizer for the appellant (instructed by Hunt & Hunt)
P M Tate SC, Solicitor-General for the State of Victoria with S B McNicol and M J Richards for the respondent (instructed by FOI Solutions)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice
Administrative law – Freedom of information – Exempt documents – Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), s 50(4) empowered Tribunal to decide access should be granted to exempt documents if of opinion that public interest required access to be granted – Whether, in circumstances of this matter, Court of Appeal erred in concluding no basis for Tribunal to exercise power, when Court of Appeal did not examine documents.
Practice and procedure – Legal professional privilege – Waiver – Legal advice obtained in relation to petition for exercise of prerogative of mercy – Whether issue of press release disclosing existence and effect of advice inconsistent with maintenance of confidentiality in content of advice.
Words and phrases – "legal professional privilege", "mercy", "pardon", "public interest", "public interest override", "waiver".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate