High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GUMMOW, HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJ
SIE SOK APPELLANT
AND
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND
CITIZENSHIP & ANOR RESPONDENTS
Sok v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] HCA 50
16 October 2008
M60/2008
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed with costs.
2. Set aside the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia made on 5 March 2008 and 2 April 2008 and in their place order that the appeal to that Court be dismissed with costs.
On appeal from the Federal Court of Australia
Representation
D S Mortimer SC with R M Niall for the appellant (instructed by Erskine Rodan & Associates)
M A Perry QC with W S Mosley for the first respondent (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
Submitting appearance for the second respondent
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Sok v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
Citizenship and migration – Visa – Spouse visa – Non-judicially determined claim of domestic violence – Grant of relevant permanent visa required visa applicant to remain spouse of sponsor at time of grant – Exception where relationship had ceased and visa applicant had suffered domestic violence committed by sponsoring spouse – Minister's delegate not satisfied applicant was spouse of sponsor – Grant of visa refused – After Minister's refusal, applicant claimed to have suffered domestic violence – Timing of claim – Whether domestic violence exception can be engaged where applicant first raises domestic violence claim in application to Migration Review Tribunal ("Tribunal") for review of Minister's refusal – Whether Div 1.5 of Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) ("Regulations") applies to review by Tribunal or confines criteria for grant of visa to claims before original decision-maker.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate