High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FRENCH CJ, HAYNE, KIEFEL, BELL AND GAGELER JJ
ANDREW VINCENT MILLS APPELLANT
AND
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION RESPONDENT
Mills v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] HCA 51 14 November 2012 S225/2012
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed with costs.
2. Set aside the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia made on 8 December 2011 and, in their place, order that:
(a) the appeal be allowed with costs; and
(b) the orders of Emmett J made on 11 March 2011 be set aside and, in their place, order that:
(i) the appeal be allowed with costs;
(ii) the objection decision dated 12 January 2010 be set aside; and
(iii) the objection dated 29 December 2009 against the determination of 14 December 2009 under s 177EA(5)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) be allowed and the determination be set aside.
On appeal from the Federal Court of Australia
Representation
A H Slater QC with D F C Thomas and G S Antipas for the appellant (instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills)
N J Williams SC with J O Hmelnitsky for the respondent (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Mills v Commissioner of Taxation
Taxation – Income tax – Equity interests – Imputation system – Schemes to reduce income tax – Power of Commissioner under Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 177EA to make determination that no imputation benefit to arise – Whether "having regard to the relevant circumstances" scheme entered into or carried out for purpose of enabling taxpayer to obtain imputation benefit – Whether purpose an "incidental purpose" – Relevance of distribution being traceable to source not taxed in Australia – Relevance of scheme resulting in reduced cost of capital to whether scheme results in "change" in financial position.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate