High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FRENCH CJ,
GUMMOW, HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJ
PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE COMPANY OF
AUSTRALIA LIMITED & ORS PLAINTIFFS
AND
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & ORS DEFENDANTS
Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Limited v Commonwealth of Australia
[2012] HCA 8
28 March 2012
S23/2010
ORDER
Order that the questions stated in the Special Case filed on 3 February 2011 be answered as follows:
Question 1: Are some or all of the provisions in ss 109 and 152 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) beyond the legislative competence of Parliament by reason of s 51(xxxi) of the Constitution?
Answer: The provisions in s 152 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) which were alleged by the plaintiffs to be invalid are not invalid and, therefore, s 109 is not invalid.
Question 2: If so, should some or all of these provisions be read down or severed and, if so, how?
Answer: This question does not arise.
Question 3: What order should be made in relation to the costs of the Special Case?
Answer: The plaintiffs should pay the defendants' costs of the Special Case.
Representation
R Cobden SC and J K Kirk with A Rao for the plaintiffs (instructed by Gilbert + Tobin Lawyers)
S J Gageler SC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth and S B Lloyd SC with K Richardson for the first defendant (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
J C Sheahan SC with C A Moore for the second defendant (instructed by ABC Legal Services)
A J Meagher SC with G R Kennett SC for the third defendant (instructed by Minter Ellison Lawyers)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Limited v Commonwealth of Australia
Intellectual property – Copyright – Sound recordings – Source of rights – Transitional provisions – Whether after commencement of Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), the Copyright Act 1911 (Imp) remained source of subsisting copyright in pre-1969 sound recordings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate