High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL AND GAGELER JJ
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE APPELLANT
AND
DAVID GRANT EATON & ANOR RESPONDENTS
Commissioner of Police v Eaton [2013] HCA 2 8 February 2013 S230/2012
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside orders (a), (b) and (c) of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales made on 6 March 2012 and, in their place, order that the appeal to the Court of Appeal be dismissed.
3. Set aside the orders of the Full Bench of the Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales made on 24 March 2012.
4. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the proceedings in this Court.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Representation
M J Leeming SC with M C L Seck for the appellant (instructed by Bartier Perry)
S Crawshaw SC with P F Lowson and A L Howell for the first respondent (instructed by Walter Madden Jenkins)
Submitting appearance for the second respondent
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Commissioner of Police v Eaton
Jurisdiction – Subject matter jurisdiction – Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales ("IR Commission") – Probationary police officer dismissed by Commissioner of Police under s 80(3) of the Police Act 1990 (NSW) – Probationary police officer applied to IR Commission under s 84(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) claiming dismissal was harsh, unreasonable or unjust – Whether IR Commission has jurisdiction under Pt 6 of Ch 2 of the Industrial Relations Act to determine unfair dismissal claim regarding dismissal under s 80(3) of the Police Act.
Statutes – Statutory interpretation – Implied repeal – Part 6 of Ch 2 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) allows public sector employees to challenge dismissal as harsh, unreasonable or unjust – Section 80(3) of the Police Act 1990 (NSW) permits Commissioner of Police to dismiss probationary police officers from the New South Wales Police Force at any time and without reason – Inconsistency and incoherence between provisions of the Industrial Relations Act and the Police Act – Whether Parliament intended the general provisions of the Industrial Relations Act to affect the operation of the earlier specific provisions of the Police Act.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate