High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ, BELL, GAGELER, KEANE AND EDELMAN JJ
IN THE MATTER OF QUESTIONS REFERRED TO THE COURT OF DISPUTED RETURNS PURSUANT TO SECTION 376 OF THE COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL ACT 1918 (CTH) CONCERNING THE HON MS FIONA NASH
Re Nash [No 2] [2017] HCA 52 Date of Order: 15 November 2017 Date of Publication of Reasons: 6 December 2017 C17/2017
ORDER
1. The summons filed on 7 November 2017 for a declaration that Ms Hollie Hughes is duly elected as a senator for the State of New South Wales for the place for which Ms Fiona Nash was returned is dismissed.
2. The Commonwealth is to pay Ms Hughes' costs.
Representation
S P Donaghue QC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth with M P Costello and J D Watson appearing on behalf of the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
A R Moses SC with S J P Duggan and P G Sharp appearing on behalf of Ms Hughes (instructed by Harpur Phillips)
G R Kennett SC with B K Lim appearing as amicus curiae (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
No appearance for the Hon Ms Nash
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Re Nash [No 2]
Constitutional law (Cth) – Parliamentary elections – Reference to Court of Disputed Returns – Where Court held there was a vacancy in representation of New South Wales in Senate – Where Court made directions for special count of ballot papers to fill vacancy – Where orders sought following special count that Ms Hollie Hughes be declared elected as senator to fill vacancy – Where Ms Hughes nominated for election to Senate at 2016 general election – Where Ms Hughes not declared elected following polling for 2016 general election – Where Ms Hughes appointed to Administrative Appeals Tribunal one year after 2016 general election – Where Ms Hughes resigned from that position upon Court holding there was a vacancy in representation of New South Wales in Senate – Where that position was "office of profit under the Crown" within meaning of s 44(iv) of Constitution – Whether holding position for that period rendered Ms Hughes "incapable of being chosen" as a senator under s 44(iv) of Constitution.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate