High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ, BELL, KEANE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJ
JOHN COLLINS APPELLANT
AND
THE QUEEN RESPONDENT
Collins v The Queen [2018] HCA 18 9 May 2018 B68/2017
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside the order of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland dated 2 June 2017 and in lieu thereof order that:
(a) the appellant's appeal to that Court be allowed;
(b) the appellant's convictions and sentences be quashed; and
(c) a new trial be had.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of Queensland
Representation
P J Callaghan SC with D K Fuller for the appellant (instructed by Legal Aid Queensland)
M R Byrne QC for the respondent (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (Qld))
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Collins v The Queen
Criminal law – Appeal against convictions – Jury direction – Prior inconsistent statement – Where appellant indicted for indecent assault, aggravated indecent assault and rape – Where consent main issue at trial – Where complainant made preliminary complaints to mother and others – Where mother gave evidence at committal hearing – Where mother gave different account at trial – Where trial judge directed jury committal evidence could only be used to assess mother's credibility – Where mother confirmed at trial she had given that evidence at committal and her memory was better at committal – Whether mother actually adopted committal evidence – Whether prior inconsistent statement available to jury to assess complainant's credibility – Whether trial judge misdirected jury.
Criminal law – Appeal against convictions – Application of proviso – Where Court of Appeal found erroneous jury direction – Where prosecution disavowed reliance on proviso – Where Court of Appeal applied proviso without notice and notwithstanding disavowal – Whether Court of Appeal bound to put appellant on notice of possibility of applying proviso.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate