High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ, GAGELER AND NETTLE JJ
EMP144 APPELLANT
AND
THE REPUBLIC OF NAURU RESPONDENT
EMP144 v The Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 21 16 May 2018 M151/2017
ORDER
Appeal dismissed with costs.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of Nauru
Representation
J W K Burnside QC with M L L Albert for the appellant (instructed by Allens)
A Aleksov for the respondent (instructed by Republic of Nauru)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
EMP144 v The Republic of Nauru
Migration – Refugees – Appeal as of right from Supreme Court of Nauru – Where Secretary of Department of Justice and Border Control of Nauru ("Secretary") determined appellant not refugee under Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr) – Where Secretary determined Nauru did not owe appellant complementary protection under Refugees Convention Act – Where Refugee Status Review Tribunal ("Tribunal") affirmed Secretary's determinations on basis appellant could reasonably relocate within country of origin – Where Supreme Court of Nauru affirmed Tribunal's decision – Whether appellant's ability reasonably to relocate within country of origin relevant to claim for complementary protection – Whether Tribunal failed to raise issue of whether appellant could reasonably relocate – Whether Tribunal failed to take into account factors relevant to appellant's ability reasonably to relocate – Whether Tribunal misunderstood country information.
Words and phrases – "complementary protection", "country information", "internal relocation", "reasonable internal relocation", "refugee", "well-founded fear of persecution".
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984), Art 3. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), Arts 6, 7. Nauru (High Court Appeals) Act 1976 (Cth), s 5. Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr), ss 4, 22(b), 34(4), 40(1), 43.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate