High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ, BELL, KEANE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJ
BORIS ROZENBLIT APPELLANT
AND
MICHAEL VAINER & ANOR RESPONDENTS
Rozenblit v Vainer [2018] HCA 23 13 June 2018 M114/2017
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside orders 2 and 3 of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria made on 17 March 2017 and in their place order that:
(a) the appeal be allowed with costs; and
(b) the orders of Cameron J made on 10 August 2016 be set aside and in their place it be ordered that:
(i) the appeal be allowed with costs; and
(ii) in respect of the orders of Lansdowne AsJ made on 22 December 2015:
(A) Orders 1, 6, 7 and 8 be set aside;
(B) Order 2 be amended to delete the words "On payment of these amounts" and to add, after "within 14 days", the words "of the date of the final orders of the High Court of Australia in Matter No M114 of 2017"; and
(C) it be ordered that the defendants pay the plaintiff's costs in relation to the defendants' summons filed 17 July 2015 on a standard basis.
3. The respondents pay the appellant's costs.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of Victoria
Representation
J G Korman for the appellant (instructed by the appellant)
R M Garratt QC with M G McNamara for the respondents (instructed by CIE Legal)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Rozenblit v Vainer
Practice and procedure – Victoria – Stay of proceeding – Where appellant commenced proceeding in Supreme Court of Victoria – Where appellant made applications for leave to file and serve amended statement of claim – Where applications refused with costs taxed immediately – Where costs unpaid because appellant impecunious – Where appellant made further application – Where leave to amend statement of claim granted but proceeding stayed under Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic) r 63.03(3) until interlocutory costs orders paid – Whether primary judge erred in making order to stay proceedings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate