High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ, GAGELER, KEANE, NETTLE AND EDELMAN JJ
SORWAR HOSSAIN APPELLANT
AND
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION & ANOR RESPONDENTS
Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34 15 August 2018 S1/2018
ORDER
The appeal is dismissed with costs.
On appeal from the Federal Court of Australia
Representation
G O'L Reynolds SC with B M Zipser and D P Hume for the appellant (instructed by Mooney & Kennedy Solicitors)
C J Horan QC with T Reilly for the first respondent (instructed by Sparke Helmore Lawyers)
Submitting appearance for the second respondent
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Migration – Partner visa – Criteria prescribed for grant of visa – Where Minister for Immigration and Border Protection must refuse to grant visa if not satisfied that criteria prescribed for grant of visa met – Where delegate of Minister refused to grant visa – Review of decision by Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Where Tribunal not satisfied that visa application made within 28 days or that there were compelling reasons for not applying that criterion – Where Tribunal also not satisfied that visa applicant did not have outstanding debts to the Commonwealth or that appropriate arrangements had been made for payment of debts – Where Tribunal made error of law by assessing whether compelling reasons existed as at time of visa application instead of as at time of Tribunal's decision – Whether error of law in relation to one criterion was jurisdictional error where another criterion was not met.
Words and phrases – "compelling reasons", "discretion to refuse relief", "error of law", "error of law on the face of the record", "fundamental error", "independent basis", "jurisdictional error", "materiality", "non-jurisdictional error", "reasonably and on a correct understanding and application of the applicable law", "residual discretion", "satisfied", "void", "voidable".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate