High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ, BELL, KEANE, NETTLE AND EDELMAN JJ
RICHARD JOHN McPHILLAMY APPELLANT
AND
THE QUEEN RESPONDENT
McPhillamy v The Queen [2018] HCA 52 Date of Order: 9 August 2018 Date of Publication of Reasons: 8 November 2018 S121/2018
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside the orders of the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal and, in lieu thereof, order:
(a) the appeal to that Court be allowed; and
(b) there be a new trial.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Representation
S J Odgers SC with S J Buchen for the appellant (instructed by Proctor & Associates)
L A Babb SC with K N Shead SC and B K Baker for the respondent (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW))
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
McPhillamy v The Queen
Evidence – Criminal trial – Sexual offences – Tendency evidence – Admissibility – Where appellant acolyte and complainant altar boy – Where appellant alleged to have followed complainant into church's public bathroom and committed offences – Where evidence that appellant, while working as an assistant housemaster, sexually offended against homesick boarding students who sought out appellant in private bedroom led as tendency evidence – Where tendency expressed as appellant having sexual interest in young teenage boys under his supervision and to act on that interest – Where tendency evidence of acts occurring ten years before offences charged – Where no evidence other than complainant's evidence that appellant had offended again in ten year period – Where tendency evidence unchallenged in cross-examination – Whether tendency evidence possessed significant probative value.
Words and phrases – "sexual interest", "significant probative value", "tendency evidence", "tendency expressed at a high level of generality", "tendency to act in a particular way", "tendency to have a particular state of mind".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate