High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ, BELL, GAGELER, KEANE, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJ
CLIVE FREDERICK PALMER & ORS PLAINTIFFS
AND
AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION & ORS DEFENDANTS
Palmer v Australian Electoral Commission [2019] HCA 24 Date of Order: 7 May 2019 Date of Publication of Reasons and Further Order: 14 August 2019 B19/2019
ORDER
Made on 7 May 2019:
The application is dismissed.
Made on 14 August 2019:
The plaintiffs pay the defendants' costs, being the costs that the defendants incurred up to and including the date that they filed their submitting appearance.
Representation
D F Jackson QC with L T Livingston and S J Chordia for the plaintiffs (instructed by Alexander Law)
Submitting appearance for the defendants
S P Donaghue QC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth, with G J D del Villar and S Zeleznikow for the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth, intervening (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Palmer v Australian Electoral Commission
Parliamentary elections (Cth) – House of Representatives – Counting of votes – Where s 274(2A)-(2C) of Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) provides for indicative two-candidate preferred count in each Division – Where s 7(3) of Commonwealth Electoral Act confers power on Australian Electoral Commission to do all things necessary or convenient for or in connection with performance of its functions – Where practice of Australian Electoral Commission to publish information about indicative two‑candidate preferred count for a Division after close of polls in that Division – Whether publication of information for a Division before polls closed in all parts of nation has any demonstrated effect on electoral choices – Whether information inaccurate or misleading – Whether publication constitutes imprimatur to any particular candidate or outcome – Whether publication authorised by s 7(3).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate