High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ, BELL, GAGELER, KEANE, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJ
VAN DUNG NGUYEN APPELLANT
AND
THE QUEEN RESPONDENT
Nguyen v The Queen [2020] HCA 23 Date of Hearing: 17 March 2020 Date of Judgment: 30 June 2020 D15/2019
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside the answer given on 29 May 2019 by the Full Court of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory to Question 2 of the questions referred to that Court and in lieu thereof order that the answer to that question be "Yes".
On appeal from the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Representation
M L Abbott QC with C Jacobi and A E Abayasekara for the appellant (instructed by Northern Territory Legal Aid Commission)
D J Morters SC with N M Loudon for the respondent (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (NT))
North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency appearing as amicus curiae, limited to its written submissions
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Nguyen v The Queen
Evidence – Criminal trial – Mixed statements – Where appellant interviewed by police prior to being charged – Where appellant made inculpatory and exculpatory statements during interview ("mixed statements") – Where recorded interview relevant and admissible – Where recorded interview not tendered by prosecution at trial – Whether prosecution's obligation to put case fully and fairly requires tender of records of interview containing mixed statements.
Words and phrases – "admissibility of mixed statements", "admissions", "all available, cogent and admissible evidence", "duty of fairness", "ethical practice", "fair trial", "fully and fairly", "inculpatory and exculpatory statements", "miscarriage of justice", "mixed record of interview", "mixed statement", "obligation to tender", "prosecutorial discretion", "prosecutorial duty", "record of interview", "rule of practice", "speculation by the jury", "tactical decision".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate