High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ,
GAGELER, KEANE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJ
STEVEN JAMES LEWIS APPELLANT
AND
THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY RESPONDENT
Lewis v Australian Capital Territory
[2020] HCA 26
Date of Hearing: 2 June 2020
Date of Judgment: 5 August 2020
C14/2019
ORDER
Appeal dismissed with costs.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Representation
P D Herzfeld with P A Tierney for the appellant (instructed by Ken Cush & Associates)
P J F Garrisson SC, Solicitor-General for the Australian Capital Territory, with H Younan for the respondent (instructed by ACT Government Solicitor)
S P Donaghue QC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth, with C J Tran for the Commonwealth, intervening (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Lewis v Australian Capital Territory
Damages – Tort – False imprisonment – Where appellant convicted and sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment served by periodic detention – Where appellant breached obligations of periodic detention – Where appellant liable to arrest without warrant – Where Sentence Administration Board ("Board") required by statute to decide to cancel appellant's periodic detention – Where Board's decision was held invalid for lack of procedural fairness – Where appellant unlawfully imprisoned in full-time detention for 82 days following Board's invalid decision – Where appellant's liberty already qualified and attenuated – Where appellant's imprisonment would otherwise have lawfully occurred – Where appellant awarded nominal damages – Whether award of only nominal damages appropriate – Whether appellant entitled to substantial compensatory damages – Whether vindicatory damages available.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate