High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ, GAGELER, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJ
APPLICANT S270/2019 APPELLANT
AND
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION RESPONDENT
Applicant S270/2019 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 32 Date of Hearing: 5 August 2020 Date of Judgment: 9 September 2020 S47/2020
ORDER
Appeal dismissed with costs.
On appeal from the Federal Court of Australia
Representation
S E J Prince SC with S G Lawrence and I Chatterjee for the appellant (instructed by Purcell Lawyers)
S P Donaghue QC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth, with R S Francois for the respondent (instructed by Mills Oakley)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Applicant S270/2019 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Immigration – Visas – Cancellation of visa – Revocation of cancellation – Where s 501(3A) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) provides that Minister must cancel visa if satisfied person does not pass character test because they have substantial criminal record and person is serving sentence of imprisonment on full-time basis – Where s 501CA(4) provides that Minister may revoke decision to cancel visa if conditions in s 501CA(4)(a) and (b) are met – Where s 501CA(4)(a) requires that person makes representations in accordance with invitation from Minister – Where s 501CA(4)(b) requires that Minister is satisfied person passes character test or there is another reason why decision should be revoked – Where appellant held visa which was not protection visa – Where appellant's visa cancelled under s 501(3A) and Minister declined to revoke cancellation under s 501CA(4) – Whether Minister obliged to, and failed to, consider whether non‑refoulement obligations were owed to appellant when exercising power under s 501CA(4).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate