High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ, GAGELER, KEANE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJ
NICK DEGUISA & ANOR APPELLANTS
AND
ANN LYNN & ORS RESPONDENTS
Deguisa v Lynn [2020] HCA 39 Date of Hearing: 2 September 2020 Date of Judgment: 4 November 2020 A4/2020
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside the orders of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia made on 5 September 2019 and 3 March 2020 and, in their place, order that:
(a) the appeal to that Court be allowed;
(b) paragraphs 1, 3, 4, 7 and 8 of the orders of the District Court of South Australia made on 29 August 2018 in matters DCCIV 1750 of 2016 and DCCIV 597 of 2018 be set aside and, in their place, it be ordered that:
(i) the balance of the plaintiffs' actions be dismissed; and
(ii) the plaintiffs pay the defendants' costs in both matters; and
(c) the respondents pay the appellants' costs in that Court.
3. The respondents pay the appellants' costs in this Court.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of South Australia
Representation
A L Tokley QC and H M Heuzenroeder for the appellants (instructed by Clarke Hemmerling Lawyers)
W J N Wells QC with R Ross-Smith for the respondents (instructed by Lindbloms Lawyers)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Deguisa v Lynn
Real property – Torrens system – Where appellants registered proprietors of land – Where appellants obtained planning approval to subdivide land and build two townhouses – Where present certificate of title for land referred to memorandum of encumbrance which prohibited erection of any buildings other than "a dwellinghouse" and prohibited "multiple dwellings" – Where back‑cover sheet of memorandum of encumbrance had typed statement indicating that encumbrance formed part of common building scheme – Where neither memorandum of encumbrance nor present certificate of title identified other lots benefited by restrictive covenants in memorandum of encumbrance – Where s 69 of Real Property Act 1886 (SA) provided title to land indefeasible subject to encumbrances and interests "notified" on original certificate of title of such land – Whether appellants were notified of restrictive covenants in memorandum of encumbrance in accordance with s 69.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate