High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ,
KEANE, GORDON, STEWARD AND GLEESON JJ
MALCOLM LAURENCE ORREAL APPELLANT
AND
THE QUEEN RESPONDENT
Orreal v The Queen
[2021] HCA 44
Date of Hearing: 11 November 2021
Date of Judgment: 16 December 2021
B25/2021
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside the order of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland made on 8 May 2020 and, in its place, order that:
(a) the appeal be allowed;
(b) the appellant's convictions be set aside; and
(c) a new trial be had.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of Queensland
Representation
S J Keim SC with P F Richards for the appellant (instructed by Legal Aid Queensland)
C W Heaton QC with C W Wallis for the respondent (instructed by Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Qld))
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Orreal v The Queen
Criminal practice – Appeal – Miscarriage of justice – Application of proviso that no substantial miscarriage of justice actually occurred – Where appellant convicted of unlawfully and indecently dealing with child under age of 16 years and rape – Where evidence admitted by consent that both appellant and complainant tested positive for herpes simplex virus type 1 ("impugned evidence") – Where impugned evidence irrelevant and inadmissible – Where Court of Appeal found miscarriage of justice because trial judge failed to direct jury to disregard impugned evidence in its entirety – Where Court of Appeal applied proviso because it concluded impugned evidence could not have impacted jury's assessment of reliability or credibility of complainant – Whether no substantial miscarriage of justice had actually occurred.
Words and phrases – "contested credibility", "jury's assessment of the reliability or credibility of the complainant", "miscarriage of justice", "natural limitations", "nature and effect of the error", "proviso", "substantial miscarriage of justice".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate