High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KIEFEL CJ,
GAGELER, KEANE, EDELMAN AND STEWARD JJ
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER
PROTECTION APPELLANT
AND
EFX17 RESPONDENT
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v EFX17
[2021] HCA 9
Date of Hearing: 4 December 2020
Date of Judgment: 10 March 2021
B43/2020
ORDER
Appeal dismissed.
On appeal from the Federal Court of Australia
Representation
G T Johnson SC with B D Kaplan for the appellant (instructed by Clayton Utz)
A M Mitchelmore SC with D K Fuller for the respondent (instructed by Prisoners' Legal Service Inc)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v EFX17
Immigration – Cancellation of protection visa – Notice of cancellation – Where delegate of Minister cancelled respondent's visa under s 501(3A) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Where pursuant to duties in s 501CA(3) letter from delegate and enclosures sent explaining decision to cancel respondent's visa and opportunity to make representations about revoking decision – Where letter and enclosures given to respondent by corrective services officer – Where letter incorrectly stated date on which respondent taken to have received notice – Whether Minister complied with duty to "give" written notice and particulars and "invite" representations under s 501CA(3) – Whether capacity of respondent to understand written notice, particulars, and invitation relevant to whether duties in s 501CA(3) were performed – Whether Minister or delegate required personally to perform duties in s 501CA(3) – Whether Minister failed to invite representations as letter did not specify period within which to make representations in accordance with Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate