High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GAGELER CJ,
GORDON, EDELMAN, STEWARD, GLEESON, JAGOT AND BEECH‑JONES JJ
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS APPLICANT
AND
JOSEPH LEON McQUEEN RESPONDENT
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs v McQueen
[2024] HCA 11
Date of Hearing: 14 December 2023
Date of Judgment: 10 April 2024
P2/2023
ORDER
1. Special leave to appeal is granted.
2. Appeal allowed.
3. Set aside order 1 of the orders made by the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia on 13 December 2022 and in its place order that:
(a) the appeal be allowed; and
(b) orders 1, 2 and 3 made by the Federal Court of Australia on 23 March 2022 be set aside and in their place order that the proceeding be dismissed.
4. The appellant pay the respondent's costs in this Court.
On appeal from the Federal Court of Australia
Representation
P D Herzfeld SC with N A Wootton for the applicant (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
L G De Ferrari SC with J D Donnelly for the respondent (instructed by Zarifi Lawyers)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs v McQueen
Immigration – Visas – Cancellation of visa – Revocation of cancellation decision – Where respondent's visa mandatorily cancelled under s 501(3A) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Where respondent made representations seeking revocation of cancellation decision under s 501CA(4) – Where Minister provided by Department of Home Affairs with submission summarising respondent's representations, draft statement of reasons, copies of respondent's representations and other relevant material – Where Minister decided to personally exercise power under s 501CA(4) to revoke cancellation decision – Where Minister decided not to revoke cancellation decision – Where Minister read only departmental submission and draft statement of reasons – Where s 501CA(4) obliges Minister to "read, identify, understand and evaluate" representations – Whether Minister required to personally read some or all of respondent's representations to form state of satisfaction whether "another reason" existed to revoke cancellation of respondent's visa – Whether Minister entitled to rely upon summary of representations contained in departmental submission – Whether summary provided adequate and accurate.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate