High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GAGELER CJ,
GORDON, EDELMAN, STEWARD, GLEESON, JAGOT AND BEECH‑JONES JJ
Matter No S118/2023
PRODUCTIVITY PARTNERS PTY LTD (TRADING
AS CAPTAIN COOK COLLEGE) & ANOR APPELLANTS
AND
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER
COMMISSION & ANOR RESPONDENTS
Matter No S116/2023
BLAKE WILLS APPELLANT
AND
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER
COMMISSION & ORS RESPONDENTS
Productivity Partners Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Wills v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
[2024] HCA 27
Date of Hearing: 7 & 8 February 2024
Date of Judgment: 14 August 2024
S118/2023 & S116/2023
ORDER
In each matter:
Appeal dismissed with costs.
On appeal from the Federal Court of Australia
Representation
J C Giles SC with R B Davies for the appellants in S118/2023 and the second and third respondents in S116/2023 (instructed by MinterEllison)
M R Hodge KC with C E Bannan for the appellant in S116/2023 and the second respondent in S118/2023 (instructed by HWL Ebsworth Lawyers)
S P Donaghue KC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth, and O Bigos KC with S A C Patterson and L G Moretti for the first respondent in both matters (instructed by Johnson Winter Slattery)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Productivity Partners Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Wills v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Trade practices – Consumer protection – Unconscionable conduct – Where s 21 of Australian Consumer Law ("ACL") relevantly provided that persons must not, in trade or commerce, in connection with supply of services, "engage in conduct that is, in all the circumstances, unconscionable" – Where s 224(1) of ACL relevantly provided that Court may order person to pay pecuniary penalty when that person "knowingly concerned in, or party to, the contravention" of provisions including s 21 – Where Productivity Partners Pty Ltd ("College") offered vocational education and training ("VET") courses funded through Commonwealth loan program – Where College altered enrolment process to remove safeguards ameliorating known risks of unwitting or unsuitable persons becoming and remaining enrolled at date on which VET fees became claimable by College from Commonwealth – Where Mr Wills was Chief Operating Officer of parent company of College and, for part of relevant period, acting Chief Executive Officer of College – Whether College engaged in unconscionable conduct in contravention of s 21 of ACL – Whether Mr Wills knowingly concerned in or party to that contravention.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate