High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GAGELER CJ,
GORDON, EDELMAN, STEWARD, GLEESON, JAGOT AND BEECH‑JONES JJ
ANTHONY NAAMAN APPELLANT
AND
JAKEN PROPERTIES AUSTRALIA PTY
LIMITED & ORS RESPONDENTS
Naaman v Jaken Properties Australia Pty Limited
[2025] HCA 1
Date of Hearing: 11 October 2024
Date of Judgment: 5 February 2025
S26/2024
ORDER
Appeal dismissed with costs.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Representation
B W Walker SC with P Afshar Mazandaran and N A Wootton for the appellant (instructed by KB Legals)
J C Kelly SC with S V Shepherd and A E Maroya for the respondents (instructed by Jeresyn Legal)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Naaman v Jaken Properties Australia Pty Limited
Equity – Fiduciary obligation – Successor trustee and former trustee – Where former trustee has entitlement in equity to be indemnified out of trust assets for expenses and liabilities properly incurred – Where trustee has beneficial interest in trust assets commensurate with that entitlement to indemnification – Where appellant is judgment creditor of former trustee and subrogated to former trustee's entitlement to indemnification – Where successor trustee transferred trust assets to third parties leaving insufficient trust assets to satisfy former trustee's entitlement to indemnification – Whether successor trustee owes fiduciary obligation to former trustee – Whether fiduciary obligation owed in respect of entitlement of former trustee to indemnification out of trust assets or commensurate beneficial interest in trust assets retained by former trustee following replacement by successor trustee.
Words and phrases – "beneficial interest", "cestui que trust", "dishonest and fraudulent design", "equitable proprietary interest", "exoneration", "fiduciary obligation", "fiduciary relationship", "former trustee", "incoherence", "indemnification", "knowing assistance", "priority", "security interest", "successor trustee", "vulnerability".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate