High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GAGELER CJ,
GORDON, EDELMAN, STEWARD, GLEESON, JAGOT AND BEECH‑JONES JJ
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND
MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS & ORS APPELLANTS
AND
MZAPC RESPONDENT
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v MZAPC
[2025] HCA 5
Date of Hearing: 13 August & 13 November 2024
Date of Judgment: 5 March 2025
P21/2024
ORDER
Appeal dismissed with costs.
On appeal from the Federal Court of Australia
Representation
P D Herzfeld SC with J G Wherrett for the appellants and on behalf of the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth, intervening (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
C L Lenehan SC with A F L Krohn, C J Tran and A R Sapienza for the respondent (instructed by Pinnacle Lawyers)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v MZAPC
Immigration – Unlawful non-citizens – Where proceeding for declaration that departmental officer exceeded executive power of Commonwealth – Where departmental officer declined to refer to Minister request for exercise of power under s 195A of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Where s 198(6) of Migration Act imposed duty on officers to remove unlawful non-citizen as soon as reasonably practicable – Where proceeding did not challenge valid application of s 198(6) to unlawful non-citizen – Whether Federal Court could make interlocutory order restraining officers from removing unlawful non-citizen notwithstanding duty imposed by s 198(6) – Meaning of "reasonably practicable" – Relevance of Tait v The Queen (1962) 108 CLR 620.
Words and phrases – "balance of convenience", "effective exercise of jurisdiction", "executive power", "incidental power", "integrity of court processes", "interlocutory injunction", "interpretative accommodation", "liberty to consider", "non-compellable power", "personal power", "preserve subject matter", "preserve utility of final relief", "prima facie case", "principle of legality", "procedural decision", "reasonably practicable", "remove unlawful non‑citizen", "statutory duty", "statutory power", "statutory process".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate