High Court of Australia
High Court of Australia Barwick C.J. Kitto, Taylor, Windeyer and Owen JJ. Inglis v Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia [1969] HCA 44
ORDER Appeal allowed with costs. Order appealed against set aside and in lieu thereof order that the summons to strike out the writ be dismissed with costs.
Cur. adv. vult.
The following written judgments were delivered:—
Sept. 4 Barwick C.J.
I have had the advantage of reading the reasons for judgment prepared in this matter by my brother Kitto. As I entirely agree with his analysis of the relevant legislation, his conclusions and his reasons therefor, I have no need to do more than express myself on one aspect of the construction of s. 75 of the Constitution. The fundamental purpose, as it seems to me, of including par. (iii.) in this section of the Constitution thus giving original jurisdiction to this Court in all matters in which the Commonwealth, or a person suing or being sued on behalf of the Commonwealth, is a party was to ensure that the Commonwealth either in its form as established under the Constitution, or in any form with which it may lawfully clothe itself should not be compelled to pursue its rights in the courts of the States. The addition of the words "or a person suing or being sued on behalf of the Commonwealth" are to my mind a furtherance of this purpose. Consequently, in the construction and application of s. 75 (iii.) largeness rather than narrowness of approach is appropriate. If in reality the Commonwealth is before the Court in the litigation, no matter of form or of nomenclature can be allowed to deny the Court jurisdiction to hear and determine the rights asserted by or against it.
I agree that the writ in this case initiated a matter in which the Commonwealth or a person suing or being sued on behalf of the Commonwealth was a party. There is no need to decide into which part of s. 75 (iii.) the matter falls. My own personal preference would be to regard the matter as one in which the Commonwealth was a party
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate