High Court of Australia
High Court of Australia Barwick C.J. McTiernan, Menzies, Owen and Walsh JJ. Guthrie v Herbert [1970] HCA 13
ORDER Application for special leave to appeal refused with costs. Barwick C.J.
Two submissions were made to us by counsel for the applicant for special leave to appeal in this matter.
The first was that the construction put upon the statutory definition of obscene publication in s. 2 of The Vagrants, Gaming and Other Offences Acts, 1931 to 1967 Q. by the Supreme Court of Queensland in the case of Humphries v. Smith; Ex parte Smith [1] was erroneous.
1. [1963] Qd. R. 67.
The second was that no reasonable man could conclude that the Aubrey Beardsley print, "Lysistrata and the Three Ladies", of which a copy is in evidence, emphasizes matters of sex.
As to the first of these submissions, the question it raises is no more than a matter of determining the meaning of the words chosen by the legislature in the definition it has enacted in the definition of "obscene publication". However put, the applicant's argument involves some modification or qualification of the statutory definition. That is something the Court is not authorized to do. I see no reason to question the conclusion that a publication which emphasizes matters of sex falls within the words of the statute. There must, of course, be emphasis which is not satisfied by a mere depiction of nudity. There would therefore, in my opinion, be no point in granting special leave to appeal in order to consider the decision of the Supreme Court of Queensland in Humphries v. Smith; Ex parte Smith [1] .
1. [1963] Qd. R. 67.
As to the second submission, I am of the opinion it does not raise in this case a ground for the grant of special leave. As well, I do not think that it has been shown that the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland was in error in concluding that there was material before the magistrate in this case on which he could reach the conclusion which he did. In my opinion, therefore, the application for special leave should be refused.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate