Incorporated Council of Law Reporting (Qld) v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1924] HCA 23
High Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
; ae
CSR 191 fies!
580 HIGH COURT (1924.
{HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.)
REPORTING FOR THE STATE OF
QUEENSLAND
THE INCORPORATED COUNCIL OF LAW |
| APPELLANT ;
AND
THE FEDERAL COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION ResponDEnT.
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF
QUEENSLAND.
H.C. or A, Income Tax — Assessment — Exemption — Public authority — Public educational
1924. institution—Company—Association not for profit—Objects of company—
eS. Publication of law reports—Assistance to Supreme Court libraries—Income Taz
BRISBANE, Assessment Act 1915-1918 (No. 34 of 1915—No. 18 of 1918), secs. 3, 10, 11,
June 23. 14, 16—Companies Act Amendment Act 1889 (Q.) (53 Vict. No. 18), sec. 26.
Isages A.C, 'The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for the State of Queensland,
ich ai
Starke 37. registered as an association not for profit under sec. 26 of the Companies Act
Amendment Act 1889 (Q.), for the purpose of publishing law reports, is not
a "public authority"? or a "public educational institution" within the
meaning of sec. 11, (1) (a), (d), of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1915-1918,
and is not exempt from income tax.
Case Srarep.
On the hearing of an appeal to the Supreme Court of Queensland
by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for the State of
Queensland from an assessment of Federal income tax, Lukin J.
stated a case, which was substantially as follows, for the opinion
of the Full Court of the High Court :—
1. The appellant, the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for
the State of Queensland is an association duly registered and
incorporated under sec. 26 of the Companies Act Amendment Act of
1889 (Q.).
34 C.L.R.J OF AUSTRALIA.
2. The articles of association provide (inter alia) :—
"(5) On and after 31st December 1908 the Incorporated Council
shall consist of members to be appointed as follows : Three members
of the Bar of Queensland practising in the City of Brisbane and
three solicitors of the Supreme Court of Queensland practising in
the City of Brisbane to be appointed by three of the Justices of the
Supreme Court and such members shall retire at the end of every
year but shall be eligible for reappointment. The Incorporated
Council shall also include the Attorney-General and the Solicitor-
General and the Registrar of the Supreme Court at Brisbane for
the time being as ex-officio members during the time they
respectively hold their offices (if respectively willing to be and act
as such members)."
"(10) The constitution of the Incorporated Council may be varied
from time to time by resolution of the Incorporated Council with
the consent in writing of three of the Justices of the Supreme Court
of Queensland."
(18) The Incorporated Council are empowered to hire or take
on lease any lands or tenements for the purposes of the Incorporated
Council upon such terms as they shall think fit and to let or
surrender any such premises from time to time, also to institute
conduct defend compromise or refer to arbitration or abandon any
legal or other proceedings which shall be brought or taken against
the Incorporated Council or any of their officers printers or
publishers or which shall otherwise relate to their property or affairs ;
also to invest in their names or in the names of two or more trustees
to be named by them for that purpose any moneys or funds of the
Incorporated Council not required for their immediate purpose in
stocks or funds of the Government of the State of Queensland or
in the Savings Bank of the State of Queensland and also to place any
moneys on deposit at interest with any joint stock banking company
carrying on business in Queensland and from time to time realize or
vary their investments or securities as they shall think fit.
"(19) The proceeds of the sale of reports and other profits of the
Incorporated Council shall be applied as follows :—(1) In paying
the current expenses costs charges and other disbursements of
the Incorporated Council in the conduct and management of the
H.C. ov A.
1924.
cor.
PORATED
Counem
or Law
ReErortinG
FOR THE
Starr oF
Queens-
LAND
v
FEDERAL
Commis-
SIONER OF
'TAXATION.
H.C. or A.
1924.
Incor-
PORATED
CounciL
or Law
REPORTING
FOR THE
STATE OF
QUEENS:
LAND
o
FEpERAL
Commis-
SIONER OF
'TAXATION.
HIGH COURT (1924.
affairs of the association or relating thereto including all liabilities
of the existing Council of Law Reporting. (2) In paying the salaries
of the editors and reporters secretary and other officers in such manner
as shall from time to time be arranged or agreed upon with them.
(3) In defraying the other expenses of the publication sale and
distribution of the Queensland Law Reporter and of the Reports
and other publications. (4) In paying the rent of any lands or
tenements hired or taken on lease as aforesaid or any repairs
alterations and other outgoings in respect of such premises. (5) In
supplementing the funds of the committees of the libraries of the
Supreme Court of Queensland or in forming a reserve fund to meet
future contingencies or in reducing the cost of any of the publications
of the Incorporated Council to subscribers or others in such other
way as the Incorporated Council in their discretion shall from
time to time consider best calculated to improve the libraries of the
Supreme Courts of the State of Queensland or the present system of
law reporting or otherwise to provide for the purposes expressed in
the memorandum of association.
(20) The application of the proceeds of the sale of reports and
other profits of the Incorporated Council may without prejudice to
existing engagements be varied as the Incorporated Council shall
from time to time determine or as the course of their operations
shall from time to time require or render expedient but so as always
strictly to adhere to the rule prescribed by the memorandum of
association that the income and property of the association
whencesoever derived shall be applied solely towards the promotion
of the objects of the association as set forth in the memorandum of
association."
3. The memorandum of association provides as follows :—
"(3) The objects for which the association is established are (inter
alia) :—(a) The preparation and publication in a convenient form at
a moderate price and under gratuituous professional superintendence
and control of reports of judicial decisions of the Supreme Court in
the State of Queensland. (d) To supplement or assist any of the
libraries of the Supreme Court of the State of Queensland by gifts
of any of the publications of the association or publications received
by it or of such profits of the association as the Council shall from
time to time determine to donate. ,
'
34 C.L.RJ OF AUSTRALIA.
"(4) The income and property of the association whencesoever 4- C- Gye
1924.
derived shall be applied solely towards the promotion of the objects
of the association as set forth in this memorandum of association
and no portion thereof shall be paid or transferred directly or
indirectly by way of dividend bonus or otherwise howsoever by
way of profit to the persons who at any time are or have been
members of the association or to any of them or to any person
claiming through them: Provided that nothing herein shall
prevent the payment in good faith of remuneration to any editors
reporters secretaries officers or servants of the association or to *!
any members of the association or other person in return for any
services actually rendered to the association.
"(8) If after the dissolution of the association there remains
after the satisfaction of all its debts and liabilities any property
whatever the same shall not be paid to or distributed among the
members of the association but shall be given or transferred to
the committee of the library of the Supreme Court of the State of
Queensland at Brisbane to be distributed amongst the committees
of the libraries of the Supreme Court of the said State in such
proportions as the committee of the said first-mentioned library
shall determine or if at any time such last-mentioned committee
shall not be in existence to such public legal library or libraries in
the State of Queensland and in such proportions as a Justice of
the Supreme Court of the said State having jurisdiction in the matter
may determine for the purpose of purchasing legal or other works
for the said library or libraries."
4. [A copy of the memorandum and articles of association was
annexed to the special case.]
5. Pursuant to the said memorandum and articles of association
between Ist February 1919 and 31st December 1919 an aggregate
sum of £350 was paid to the respective committees of the Supreme
Court libraries at Brisbane, Townsville and Rockhampton, but
such sum was not allowed as a deduction in calculating the taxable
income of the appellant.
6. The said libraries are open for the use, free of any charge, to
the Justices of the Supreme Court, barristers and solicitors,
conveyancers, students-at-law, articled clerks and solicitors' clerks
Rerortinc
FOR THE
or
H.C. oF A
Ixcor-
PORATED
CounciL
or Law
Rerortine
FOR THE
STaTe oF
QUEENS-
LAND
v.
FEDERAL
Commis-
SIONER OF
TAXATION.
HIGH COURT (1924.
in the respective towns in which the libraries are situated, and they
respectively make use of the books in the said libraries very
extensively, both for reference purposes and for citations in Court,
and the said libraries are practically indispensable for the due
conduct of the Supreme Court. As a fact the said libraries are also
used free of any charge by Crown Law officers, Court officials,
including the Registrars, Police Magistrates, Clerks of Petty Sessions,
and by actual litigants not having legal advisers. Students-at-law and
articled clerks also make general use of the books in the said libraries
for the purpose of preparing themselves to qualify as barristers or
solicitors, and any members of the public who desire to use the same
may upon obtaining permission do so.
7. The gross income of the appellant for the year ending on 31st
December 1919 was £1,361, from which sum the appellant was
allowed deductions amounting to £802.
8. The respondent assessed the appellant for the payment of income
tax based upon income derived during the year 1919 on the sum
of £559 as income of a company not distributed.
9. The appellant duly gave notice of objection on the grounds :
(i.) That the Council is notliable to pay income tax, being exempt
under sec. 11 (1) (d) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1915-1918 ;
(ii.) that the Council is not liable to pay income tax, as the Council
is not carried on for profit or gain to the individual members thereof ;
(iii.) that if the Council is liable the rate at which it is assessed is
excessive, and the Council contends that it is not liable to be assessed
under any section or schedule applicable to companies; (iv.) the
assessment is contrary to law.
10. The appellant duly required the notice of objection to be
treated as a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court of Queensland.
The opinion of the High Court was asked on the following
questions :—
(1) Is the appellant liable to assessment to income tax as to
any and what amount (a) as a company on the income
which was not distributed; or (b) as a person ?
(2) Is the appellant exempt from assessment to income tax ?
(3) By whom should the costs of this special case be paid ?
a
34 C.L.R.] OF AUSTRALIA.
Stumm K.C. (with him Douglas), for the appellant. The appellant
company is not a company assessable to income tax under the
Income Tax Assessment Act 1915-1918: it was formed for certain
useful objects to the promotion of which its profits are solely
applicable ; it has no power to pay any dividend to members; and
it was registered under the Companies Act Amendment Act of 1889
(Q.) (53 Vict. No. 18), sec. 26, as an association not for profit. In
strictness it has and can have no profit and itself is in receipt of no
taxable income as a company. Further, the company is exempt as
a " public authority " (sec. 11 (1) (a) ) and as a " public educational
institution" (sec. 11 (1) (d) ).
[Isaacs A.C.J. I do not know how this body of persons are able
to constitute themselves a public authority. I can only understand
their constitution as a public authority by the exercise of some
statutory power authorizing them to act on behalf of the public or
of the State.]
Primarily the Act indicates no intention to impose taxation on
the income of a company in which the company can take no benefit
and in which no one can take benefit except by the exercise of the
company's power to make a gift to a particular class of donees.
Hart, for the respondent, was not called on.
Tue Courr delivered the following judgment :—
This case may be dealt with very shortly. The appellant is an
association incorporated and registered under the Companies Act
Amendment Act of 1889 (Q.). The Income Tax Assessment Act 1915-
1918 contains provisions for assessment of income tax on the taxable
income of companies. A company includes all bodies or associations
corporate or unincorporate, but does not include partnerships (sec. 3).
By sec. 10 of that Act income tax is, subject to the provisions
of the Act, payable upon the taxable income derived by every
taxpayer, that is, " any person chargeable with income tax" (sec. 3),
and "'person" includes a company (sec. 3). There is no doubt that
this association is a taxpayer within sec. 10 of the Act. In sec.
11 (1) the Legislature has directed its attention to a determination
of what incomes should be exempt from income tax, and has declared
that the revenue of a public authority (sub-sec. (a) ) and the income
You. XXXIv. 39
A. C. oF A.
1924.
Incor-
PORATED
Counem
or Law
REPORTING
FOR THE
Stare or
QuEENs-
LAND
v.
Ferra
Conmas-
SIONER OF
TAXATION.
H.C. or A.
1924.
vw
Incor-
PORATED
Councm
or Law
REPORTING
FOR THE
SraTE OF
QuEENs-
LAND
v.
Feprrat
Comnns-
SIONER OF
Taxation.
HIGH COURT C1
of a public educational institution (sub-sec. (d) ) are amongst th
which are to be exempt. Sec. 14 contains a list of dividends,
interest, profits, and receipts, &c., which are statutorily defined as
income of any person. The income of this company is income within
that definition. Sec. 16 enables certain deductions to be made for
the purpose of ascertaining the taxable income of a company from
the total assessable income of a company in addition to any other —
deduction allowed by the Act, under the circumstances stated in
that section. Those circumstances, however, do not, and, perhaps,
cannot, exist with respect to the appellant company, and that is
the only reason for not applying the section. These considerations, —
in our opinion, indicate that, unless this company falls within any
of the exemptions specified in sec. 11, it cannot be exempt as a
company at all. The only two provisions of that section upon
which counsel place reliance are sub-secs. (a) and (d), to which I
have referred. But this company clearly is not a public body and,
in our opinion, it is not a public educational institution.
The answers to the question must be, first, that the company is
liable to assessment to income tax as a company on the income
which was not distributed; and to the second question, the |
company is not exempt from assessment to income tax.
The third question is " By whom should the costs of this special —
case be paid?" We have given our answers to the substantial
questions submitted to us; and we remit the case to the Supreme —
Court to be determined in accordance with the judgment, with —
the opinion that the costs of this special case be costs in the appeal.
Question 1 answered: Appellant is liable to
assessment to income tax as a company
on the income which was not distributed.
Question 2 answered in the negative. Ques-
tion 3: Costs of special case to be costs in the
appeal. Special case remitted to Lukin J.
Solicitors for the appellant, Tully & Wilson.
Solicitors for the respondent, Chambers, McNab & McNab, foal
Gordon H. Castle, Crown Solicitor for the Commonwealth.
J. L. W.