Stiggants v Joske [1911] HCA 54

OF AUSTRALIA. 549

ondent for an answer. That being so, I have come to H.C. or A. sonclusion that I must dismiss the petition. I order the 1910 itioner to pay the respondent's costs to the extent of £100, Grovcn d the £50 deposit to be applied towards payment of the costs. os

Ozanne.

in a . . . Cont Je Petition dismissed with costs, °° = Solicitors, for the petitioner, Strongman & Crouch. ~ Solicitors, for the respondent, McCay & Thwaites. BL. ee a ae (HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA] STIGGANTS APPELLANT ; DEFENDANT, AND _ JOSKE RESPONDENT. INFORMANT,

Dentist—Person "recorded" by the Dental Board—Use of word ' Dentist"— 4 ©. op A, Words implying that he is practising dentistry—Dentists Act 1898 (Vict.) (No. 491], 1595), sec. 7*—Dentists Act 1910 (Vict.) (No. 2257), see. 13 +.

* Sec. 7 of the Dentists Act 1898 pro- _words "' dental company " or "dental {EEBOURNEs

_ vides that :—No person other than a legally qualified medical practitioner or other than a person registered under the Dentists Act 1887 or under this or the Principal Act shall, nor shall any company (other than an associa- tion consisting wholly of registered dentists), take or use or by inference

institute" or 'dental hospital" or Oct. 9, 10, *« dental college" or "college or school of dentistry " or " mechanical dentist" Griffith C.4., or any name title word letters addition {arton and, or description implying or tending to °Com™F 9. the beliet that he or euch company is

registered under the Dentists Act 1887

adopt the name title word letters addi- tion or description, of "dentist" or "dental practitioner" or 'dental surgeon " or "surgeon dentist," or use or have attached to or exhibited at his or its place of business or residence (either alone or in combinations with any other word or words or letters) the

or under this or the Principal Act or that he orsuch company is qualified to practice dentistry or is carrying on the practice of dentistry or is entitled to or