High Court of Australia
25 C.L.R.] OF AUSTRALIA. 55
offered on oath to the Court, would be conclusive on the question H- ©. or A. 1918.
= on the subject from them or from any other person. The defence Josrrw
of the existence of necessity, but in this case we have no evidence
TAL SURER
of justification under the King's prerogative in time of war therefore fails. No argument was addressed to us on the quantum of damages. Bs Ls The verdict must stand, and the appeal should be allowed. ek
Appeal allowed with costs. Motion to Full Court of Supreme Court dismissed with costs and verdict for the plaintiff for £1,321 3s. 5d. restored.
Solicitors for the appellant, #. Prichard Bassett & Co., Sydney. Solicitor for the respondent, J. V. Tillett, Crown Solicitor for New South Wales.
B. L. [HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA] HARRIS . : i : 3 hs . APPELLANT; Derenpant, AND BYERLEY . . P i ; 5 : . ReEsPponpENT. PLAINTIFF,
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND.
Contract—Construction—Agreement for services—Payment by commission on profits H. C. oF A.
—Auditor's or accountant's certificate as to profits—Arbitration clause—I nterdict 1918. Act 1867 (Qd.) (31 Vict. No. 11). ae, BrisBane,
A written contract by which B, agreed to manage H.'s businesses provided 7... 95 96 that payment for such services was to be by a fixed salary and a commission ae
on all net profits in excess of a certain sum, and that "for the purpose of Grifith C1. : iad javan Duffy,
computing the amount of the said commission and for all other purposes" 'Powers and
the balance-sheet or profit and loss account of the businesses prepared and ™°h 4
certified by H.'s auditor or accountant was to be conclusive and binding
H.C. oF A.
1918. ww
Harris v BYERLEY.
HIGH COURT " [1918.
on both parties. The agreement also contained a clause providing for arbitra- tion in accordance with the Interdict Act of 1867 (Qd.) in the case of any dispute or difference as to amount of remuneration, or as to the construction of the agreement, or as to any other matter or thing arising thereunder or in the
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate