R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration [1945] HCA 50

"at Bal Appl

y | omer : Bory " fetraten — Pas rudy fear Cov

ae ae Hie Elon ae td te ut Nuring Conn fafigs2

S15 igs fd fF AUIR Fed 1) eee" ee

Ones, — Era Py mas es Geormee PY Bere fee fe ee Workers! € Staff Pry Lid . CLR. ce ss Hemi Sse 141 ei . asc bid i) Ni picer bx NER BEB" etdto Follslctomer, AppLMet. Beary FHL Lee ' ly Pee inno 4 Red ere, Baar iton Lids Hooper 998) 84FcR Territory of

"i iSaie fones Union of fers Union of S35 Austy Gpao pie punt De ie ise roee i, RIB acy — (1595) 186

) ASIC — Al Sata Pry Lid TruthAbou Cons ise? Seer eaten bomen ewe' Atty wi GH COURT OF AUSTRALIA] "RS" fares ee Hopwood yR FM y Pe arsine ee) Sere THE KING Birectoro Hier ee FeRke" Bstolcer} (pose SSPFCR pes Sala» ee THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF CONCILIATION &, AND ARBITRATION AND OTHERS; Stas 8 pe Ex parte BARRETT AND OTHERS. Gay B Sow aia 'ARRETT AND OTHERS . S zs i . APPELLANTS ; Stee RESPONDENTS, AND OPITZ AND OTHERS 5 E ' 3 . ResponpeEnts. APPLICANTS, ON APPEAL FROM THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION. BELCHER AND OTHERS . : é ' . APPELLANTS ; H. C. or A ResPoNnDENTS, 1945. axp Ww : MELBOURNE. OPITZ AND OTHERS " 5 3 : . Responpents. May 30, 31; AppLicants, seenae ls SyDNEY, ON APPEAL FROM THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF July 30. CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION. Latham C.J., Rich, Starke, Federal Judiciary—Validity of grant of judicial power—Matter "arising under" \ Dixon and,

any laws made by the Parliament of the Commonwealth—Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration—Power to direct performance or observance of rules of organization—Validity of provision—The Constitution (63 & 64 Vict. ©. 12), 88. 76 (ii.), 77 (i)—Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904-1934 (No, 13 of 1904—No. 54 of 1934), s. 58n.

Vou, LXx. 10

142 HIGH COURT [1945.

H.C. or A. Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration—Power to direct performance 1945. or observance of rules of organization—Constitutional validity of provision—