High Court of Australia
High Court of Australia Barwick C.J. Mason and Jacobs JJ. Banque Nationale de Paris v Falkirk Developments Ltd [1977] HCA 12
ORDER Appeal dismissed with costs.
Cur. adv. vult.
The following written judgments were delivered:—
1977, Mar. 4 Barwick C.J.
The first named appellant ("the bank") was sued in the Supreme Court of New South Wales upon a deed by which it promised to pay to the respondent on demand a sum equal to the amount which, at the date of the demand, would have been held by the respondent as a retention fund under a building contract between the respondent with a company named Citra Constructions Ltd. ("Citra"), the second named appellant, such sum in any event not to exceed $164,144. By reason of the terms of the building contract and the course of its performance, the sum of $82,070 was the sum which at the date of the respondent's demand on the bank for payment under the deed the respondent would, but for the execution and delivery of the deed, have held in a retention fund under the building agreement. The Supreme Court gave judgment for the respondent for $82,070.
On production of the deed to the Court from the custody of the bank, it clearly bore the word "cancelled" upon its face. That circumstance afforded prima facie evidence that it had been duly cancelled and its obligation terminated.
However, evidence before the Supreme Court established to the satisfaction of the learned trial judge, Sheppard J., that the respondent had not agreed to the cancellation of the deed, its delivery by the respondent to the builder, Citra, and thence to the bank having taken place under a mistake, and in any case doubtfully with the authority of the respondent. That finding of fact resulted from the oral examination of witnesses and the consideration of the probabilities. There is no ground for disturbing the finding. Consequently, the cancellation not having been with the consent of the obligee, the respondent, it was nugatory. The obligation of the deed none the less remained.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate