NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: EFM Property Pty Ltd v Triangle Lighting Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 610 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 21 May 2020 Decision date: 21 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment dismissed. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — summary disposal — parties entered into contract for the sale of real property — plaintiff claims it paid deposit and that defendant acknowledged this under later deed — plaintiff seeks specific performance — whether triable issues raised by defendant — construction of deed not as clear or free of doubt as plaintiff contends — plaintiff's readiness, willingness and ability to complete put in issue — prospect of an arguable defence of hardship — not appropriate case for summary judgment Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW), s 6 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (2005), r 13.1 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552; [2000] HCA 41 Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 87 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Thornton [2012] NSWSC 217 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118; [2010] HCA 28 Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: EFM Property Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Triangle Lighting Pty Ltd (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr N Y H Li (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Mr J R B Pearson (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate