State of New South Wales v Ambrym (Final) [2020] NSWSC 612

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Ambrym (Final) [2020] NSWSC 612 Hearing dates: 20 May 2020 Decision date: 22 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Ierace J Decision: (1) Pursuant to ss 5B and 9(1)(a) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), the defendant be subject to an extended supervision order for a period of three years commencing on 28 May 2020. (2) Pursuant to s 11 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), the defendant is directed to comply with the conditions set out in the Schedule to these orders for the period of the extended supervision order. (3) Access to the Court's file for any document shall not be granted to a non-party without leave of a Judge of the Court, and with prior notice to the parties so as to allow them an opportunity to be heard in respect of the application for access. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – final hearing – application for extended supervision order (ESO) – interim supervision order previously made – ESO not opposed – Court independently satisfied of need for ESO – conditions and length of ESO a matter of dispute – terms of electronic monitoring condition – monitoring condition to provide incentive for the defendant to strictly comply with his schedule of movements – regard to protection of community and rehabilitation of offender – ESO imposed for 3 years with conditions Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v Ambrym (Preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 298 State of New South Wales v Grooms (Final) [2019] NSWSC 353 State of New South Wales v Lynn [2015] NSWSC 665 State of New South Wales v Richardson (No 2) (2011) 210 A Crim R 220; [2011] NSWSC 276 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Preliminary) [2011] NSWSC 118 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Colin James Ambrym (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Melis (Plaintiff) E Anderson (Defendant)