NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lukaszewicz v Polish Club Ltd [2020] NSWCA 99 Hearing dates: 21 May 2020 Date of orders: 21 May 2020 Decision date: 27 May 2020 Before: Ward JA at [1]; White JA at [2]; Emmett AJA at [49] Decision: (1) Order that the summons seeking leave to appeal and cross-appeal be dismissed. (2) Order that the purported notices of appeal and cross-appeal be dismissed as incompetent. (3) Order that there be no further order as to costs of the appeal, cross-appeal or applications for leave to appeal. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Court of Appeal — Competency of appeal – where purported appeal and cross appeal commenced as of right – where only the availability of declaratory and injunctive relief in issue on appeal – where leave to appeal required by s 101(2)(r) of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW)
CIVIL PROCEDURE — Court of Appeal — Leave to appeal – where the provision of declaratory relief alone as a result of a finding of oppression– where underlying controversy between the parties has been quelled – whether substantive injustice arises if primary judgment allowed to stand – whether issue of principle or public importance that is more than merely arguable if declaratory relief given is allowed to stand Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 232, 233 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 35 Registered Clubs Act 1976 (NSW), s 41E Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd (2007) 161 FCR 513; [2007] FCAFC 146 Ballas v Theophilos (No. 1) (1957) 97 CLR 186 Be Financial Pty Ltd as trustee for the Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd t/as Bennetts Green Bowl [1995] NSWCA 69 Clyne v New South Wales Bar Association (1960) 104 CLR 186 Collier v Lancer (No. 2) [2013] NSWCA 186 Commodore Business Machines Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1990) 92 ALR 563 Gibson v Drumm [2016] NSWCA 206 ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 Jabulani Pty Ltd v Walkabout II Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 267 Lukaszewicz v Polish Club Ltd [2019] NSWSC 446 Millar v Houghton Table Tennis & Sports Club Inc [2003] SASC 1 Nanschild v Pratt [2011] NSWCA 85 Oertel v Crocker (1947) 75 CLR 261 Pettit v South Australian Harness Racing Club Inc (2006) 95 SASR 543; [2006] SASC 306 Re DG and the Adoption Act 2000 [2007] NSWCA 241; (2007) 244 ALR 195 The Age Co Ltd v Liu (2013) 82 NSWLR 268; [2013] NSWCA 26 Wykrota v Polish Club Ltd [2020] NSWSC 239 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kazimiera Lukaszewicz (First Appellant/First Cross-Respondent) Mick Wykrota (Second Appellant/Second Cross-Respondent) Dariusz Plust (Third Appellant/ Third Cross-Respondent) Polish Club Limited (Respondent/Cross-Appellant) Representation: Counsel: J Ireland QC (Solicitor Advocate) with M Castle and M J Davis (Appellants) M McCulloch SC with R Notley (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate