NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: TB v R [2020] NSWCCA 108 Hearing dates: 29 April 2020 Decision date: 29 May 2020 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Hoeben CJ at CL at [2]; Harrison J at [191] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – offences of murder, two offences of specially aggravated break, enter and steal with intention to inflict grievous bodily harm, three offences of aggravated detain for advantage – two home invasions involved – basis of liability participation in a joint criminal enterprise – whether the sentence indicated for murder manifestly excessive – whether asserted error in indicative sentence produced a manifestly excessive aggregate sentence – whether error in the sentencing judge's approach to special circumstances – no error established – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Court Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – ss 18, 86(2)(a), 112(3) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – ss 3,, 3A, 53A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 5(1)(c) Cases Cited: AB v The Queen [1999] HCA 46;198 CLR 111 Barbaro v The Queen; Zirilli v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; 253 CLR 58 Beale v R [2015] NSWCCA 120 Book v R [2018] NSWCCA 58 Borg v R [2019] NSWCCA 129 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Hogarth v The Queen [2012] VSCA 302; 37 VR 658 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mulato v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 282 Obeid v R [2017] NSWCCA 221 PD v R [2012] NSWCCA 242 Regina v AA, AC, SS, Tatchell and Wildsmith [2010] NSWSC 495 R v Brown [2012] NSWCCA 199 R v Evans, John [2017] NSWSC 1440 R v Graham Keys Smith [2012] NSWSC 1565 R v Kaine (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1824 R v MA; R v Byquar; R v Ramos [2012] NSWSC 1527 R v Marwan Jubraeel [2014] NSWSC 838 R v Rolfe [2017] NSWSC 1393 R v Safar [2014] NSWSC 376 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534 R v Swan; R v Kimura (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1819 SHR v R [2014] NSWCCA 94 Vaughan v R [2020] NSWCCA 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: TB – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr T Game SC/Ms A Cook – Applicant Mr E Balodis – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate