NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Carr [2020] NSWSC 643 Hearing dates: 26 May 2020 Date of orders: 26 May 2020 Decision date: 26 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Pursuant to s 13(1) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) the extended supervision order made by Hall J on 14 August 2009 is revoked. Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – high risk offender – revocation of extended supervision order – 5 year order still in force after 11 years – Aboriginal offender – proud Wiradjuri man – mild intellectual disability – no serious offence in 19 years – where repeated minor breaches result in incarceration – smoking cannabis – breaching curfew – multiple gaol sentences imposed – punitive impact of ESO – protective purpose not served – counterproductive to rehabilitative purpose – failure toppling successes – Steinbeck – change of circumstances – ESO no longer necessary – order revoked Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), ss 10,13 Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 20 Cases Cited: R v Wilhem [2010] NSWSC 378 State of New South Wales v Bugmy [2017] NSWSC 855 State of New South Wales v Carr [2014] NSWSC 1348 Texts Cited: John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath (William Heinemann Ltd, 1939) chp 25 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Darryl Edward Carr (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D New (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate