NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Higgins v R [2020] NSWCCA 109 Hearing dates: 13 March 2020, 18 May 2020 Date of orders: 11 June 2020 Decision date: 11 June 2020 Before: Leeming JA at [1] Harrison J at [3] Hamill J at [26] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – where appellant convicted following a trial by jury – where Sheriff's report provided to trial judge following a complaint by a juror of potential juror irregularity – whether verdict should be set aside on basis of juror irregularity depriving appellant of a fair trial – where further Sheriff's report ordered – whether further Sheriff's report containing details of interviews with jurors revealed evidence of racist remarks or other derogatory comments about the appellant by jurors during the trial Legislation Cited: Criminal Code (Cth), ss 134.2(1), 145.1(1), 400.3 Jury Act 1977 (NSW) Cases Cited: CUR24 v DPP (2012) 83 NSWLR 385; [2012] NSWCA 65 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Higgins v R [2018] NSWCCA 258 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488; [2000] HCA 48 R v Higgins [2017] NSWSC 1257 Webb v The Queen (1994)181 CLR 41; [1994] HCA 30 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Melissa Jade Higgins (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Dalton SC and N Carroll (Applicant) M McHugh SC and C Newman (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate