NSW Caselaw
NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: HFD [2020] NSWCATGD 8 Hearing dates: 16 January 2020 Date of orders: 16 January 2020 Decision date: 16 January 2020 Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Before: A D Suthers, Principal Member F Duffy, Senior Member (Professional) K Clark, General Member (Community) Decision: 1. A guardianship order is made for HFD.
2. NZD, of [Address removed for publication.] is appointed as the guardian.
3. This is a continuing guardianship order for a period of two years from 16 January 2020.
4. This is a limited guardianship order giving the guardian(s) custody of HFD to the extent necessary to carry out the functions below.
FUNCTION:
5. The guardian has the following function:
a) Restrictive Practices
To give or withhold consent as to whether the following restrictive practices should be used to influence HFD's behaviour:
1. Environmental restraint 2. Mechanical restraint
CONDITIONS:
6. The conditions of this order are:
a) Standard Condition
In exercising this role the guardian shall take all reasonable steps to bring HFD to an understanding of the issues and to obtain and consider his views before making significant decisions.
b) Restrictive Practices Condition
The guardian(s) may only consent to the use of the types of restrictive practices permitted under this order to influence HFD's behaviour:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate