NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Clark v State of New South Wales [2020] NSWSC 655 Hearing dates: In Chambers on the papers Date of orders: 29 May 2020 Decision date: 29 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: (1) The plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed on 23 May 2018 is dismissed;
(2) As the matter has been dealt with in chambers without the need for any appearance by any party, the defendant's costs are costs in the cause. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – interlocutory orders - referral for pro bono representation - application to re-open proceedings – circumstances justifying re-opening proceedings – extreme duress Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6 Clark v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWSC 450 Douglas v John Fairfax & Sons Limited [1983] 3 NSWLR 126 Nominal Defendant v Manning (2000) 50 NSWLR 139 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Applicant (Self-represented) State of New South Wales (First Respondent) Commissioner for Corrective Services New South Wales (Second Respondent) The GEO Group Australia Pty Ltd (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (First and Second Respondents) The Geo Group Australia Pty Ltd (Third Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/173356
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate