NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: UTSG Pty Ltd v Sydney Metro (No 6) [2020] NSWLEC 63 Hearing dates: 8-12 and 15-16 April, 26 September, 31 October, 1 and 14 November, 9-11, 13 and 16-17 December and 18 December 2019 (further written submissions) Date of orders: 29 May 2020 Decision date: 29 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Pepper J Decision: See orders at [426]. Catchwords: COMPULSORY ACQUISITION: determination of compensation for the compulsory acquisition of a leasehold interest – corporate applicant not legally represented – applicant changed basis of claim for compensation numerous times during the proceedings – conduct of proceedings characterised by delay and non-compliance with court orders by the applicant – applicant falsified evidence – credit of director representing the corporate applicant – applicant abandoned claim for extinguishment of business due to the acquisition - applicant did not establish claim for wasted relocation costs, including wasted fitout costs – applicant did not establish claim for past loss of income – applicant did not establish claim for future loss of income – claim for legal fees and valuation costs agreed – compensation for legal costs and valuation fees offset against rental arrears owed to acquiring authority – nil compensation determined to be payable by acquiring authority.
COSTS: costs principles in compulsory acquisition cases – determination of costs where no entitlement to compensation – applicant to pay the acquiring authority's costs of the proceedings. COSTS: whether a non-party costs order should be made against a director of the applicant – legal principles to be applied in the making of non-party costs orders, especially where non-party a director of an unrepresented corporate party – conduct of director in the running of the proceedings justified the making of a non-party costs order – non-party director of corporate applicant jointly and severally liable to pay the costs of the acquiring authority. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(1) Evidence Act 1995, s 140(2) Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991, ss 34(4), 39, 42, 47, 51(3), 54, 55(a), 55(d), 56, 59(1), 66 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 7.1(2) Cases Cited: Blazai Pty Ltd v Maclarens (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 31 Brand2Content t/as Franchise Works v Dalby [2019] NSWCA 16 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336 Brock v Roads and Maritime Services (No 3) [2012] NSWCA 404; (2012) 191 LGERA 267 Brock v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 114 CCL Secure Pty Ltd v Berry [2019] FCAFC 81 Croghan v Blacktown City Council [2019] NSWCA 248; (2019) 238 LGERA 439 Dillon v Gosford City Council [2011] NSWCA 328; (2011) 184 LGERA 179 FPM Constructions Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Blue Mountains [2005] NSWCA 340 G Capital Corporation Pty Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services [2019] NSWCA 234 G Capital Corporation Pty Ltd; Gertos Holdings Pty Ltd; Marsden Developments Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services [2019] NSWLEC 12 Heath v Greenacre Business Park Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 34 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298 Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd [1992] HCA 28; (1992) 174 CLR 178 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11; (2011) 243 CLR 361 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 May v Christodoulou [2011] NSWCA 75; (2011) 80 NSWLR 462 Mitchell v Cullingral Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 389 Naomi Marble and Granite Pty Limited v FAI General Insurance Company Limited (No 2) [1999] 1 QdR 518 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd [1992] HCA 66; (1992) 67 ALJR 170 Omaya Investments Pty Limited v Dean Street Holdings Pty Limited (No 5) [2020] NSWLEC 9 PM Works Pty Ltd v Management Services Australia Pty Ltd trading as Peak Performance PM [2018] NSWCA 168 Roads and Maritime Services v United Petroleum [2019] NSWCA 41; (2019) 99 NSWLR 279 Smith v New South Wales Bar Association [1992] HCA 36; (1992) 176 CLR 256 State of New South Wales v Hunt [2014] NSWCA 47; (2014) NSWLR 226 UTSG Pty Ltd v Sydney Metro [2018] NSWLEC 128 UTSG Pty Ltd v Sydney Metro (No 2) [2018] NSWLEC 199 UTSG Pty Ltd v Sydney Metro (No 4) [2019] NSWLEC 51 UTSG Pty Ltd v Sydney Metro (No 5) [2019] NSWLEC 107 Yu v Cao [2015] NSWCA 276; (2015) 91 NSWLR 190 Texts Cited: Sir Walter Scott, Marmion: A Tale of Flodden Field (Ballantyne and Co, Edinburgh, 1808) Category: Principal judgment Parties: UTSG Pty Ltd (Applicant) Sydney Metro (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Singh and Dr M Baig (Applicant, director-represented) Mr R Lancaster SC with Mr N Eastman (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate