NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rose v Trend Designs Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 675 Hearing dates: 26 May 2020 Decision date: 01 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: See pars [40], [43] and [50]. Parties are to consult and provide draft short minutes of order to give effect to these reasons for judgment. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Pleadings — Striking out — No reasonable cause of action or defence – reflexive loss – whether shareholder can claim compensation in oppression suit quantified by reference to personal loss derived from company loss – where it is arguable that claims that would otherwise require leave to maintain a derivative action on behalf of a company under s 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) can be maintained in an oppression suit Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: In the matter of JGS Investment Holdings Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1532 Power v Ekstein [2009] NSWSC 130 Power v Ekstein [2010] NSWSC 137; 77 ACSR 302 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Brooke Erin Rose (plaintiff / respondent) Trend Designs Pty Ltd (first defendant / applicant) Shannon Anthony Baranski (second defendant / applicant) John Albert Shirlaw (third defendant / applicant) Shepherd Management Services Pty Ltd (fourth defendant / applicant) Representation: Counsel: M Bennett (plaintiff / respondent) S Wells (defendants / applicants)
Solicitors: Coleman Greig Lawyers (plaintiff / respondent) Equius Legal (defendants / applicants) File Number(s): 2019 / 318337
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate