NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chamon v R [2020] NSWCCA 112 Hearing dates: 15 April 2020 Decision date: 03 June 2020 Before: R A Hulme J at [1]; Hamill J at [56]; Wilson J at [77] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – parity – same sentencing judge for co-offenders – co-offenders charged with different offences – sentencing judge explicitly addressed differences between offenders – modest sentence in the circumstances – no justifiable sense of grievance – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 93T(1), 193B(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 53A Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(1) Cases Cited: Anthony v R [2016] VSCA 22 Dunn v R [2018] NSWCCA 108 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Hilder v R [2011] VSCA 192 Jimmy v The Queen (2010) 77 NSWLR 540 Lloyd v R [2017] NSWCCA 303 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 McCloskey-Sharp v R [2015] VSCA 87 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 at 301-302; [1997] HCA 26 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 at 279; [1999] HCA 54 Roujnikov v R [2015] VSCA 97 Ryan v R [2016] VSCA 255 Stocco, Gino v R; Stocco, Mark v R [2018] NSWCCA 77 Tatana v R [2006] NSWCCA 398 Williamson v R [2019] VSCA 138 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Florian Chamon (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I McLachlan (Applicant) Mr P Leask (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate