NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Betta Build Group Pty Ltd v El Baba (No. 3) [2020] NSWDC 272 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 04 June 2020 Decision date: 04 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraphs 30-31 Catchwords: COSTS – application by successful party to vary costs order from the usual costs order– application for indemnity costs following rejection of offers of compromise – dispute against application with respect to some of the offers – impact of commencement of proceedings in NCAT Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 60, Schedule 4 Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), ss 7E, 18F, Part 2C Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 20.26, 42.1, 42.13, 42.14 Cases Cited: Betta Build Group Pty Ltd v El Baba [2019] NSWDC 331 Betta Build Group Pty Ltd v El Baba (No.2) [2020] NSWDC 238 Jones v Bradley (No. 2) [2003] NSWCA 258 Leach v The Nominal Defendant (QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd) (No. 2) [2014] NSWCA 391 The Uniting Church v Takacs (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 172 Category: Costs Parties: Betta Build Group Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Mr AR El Baba (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr F Anwar for the plaintiff Mr M Klooster for the defendant Solicitors: SMB Law for the plaintiff G&S Law Group for the defendant File Number(s): 2018/256941 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate